About your Search

20130107
20130115
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
, who was courting gun owners in his very pro-second amendment state of nevada, in a tough battle for re-election. >> i also want to thank you, senator, for your support every day at the federal level for the second amendment, and for the rights of american gun owners. >> both reid and the nra declined to talk to cnn on camera, but democratic sources on capitol hill say the nra was not the only threat to the president's health care bill. lawmakers were also worried about conspiracy theories, circulating among gun enthusiasts that falsely accused the obama administration of plotting to use the health care law to go after gun owners. one group, gun owners of america, insists it could still happen. >> it says that all of our medical records are available to be pawed through by bureaucrats somewhere in washington, looking for a reason to disenfranchise gun owners. >> the senate majority leader's views on gun control are changing. he's in a different place than he was in 2010, says an adviser. consider how reid answered the question after the july movie theater massacre in colorado. >> with the schedu
absolutely nothing. >> do you see this as more of a setup for the elections in 2014 and 2016? >>n part. i think the white house is going to try to hit a sweet spot on this. they want something that is sort of pod rat enough and in certain ways minor enough that it has some actual chance of passing the senate and the house and something that seems reasonable enough that in the fairly high likely scenario that it doesn't pass, they can take it to the public in 2014 and 2016 and say, here is another example of republican intransigence. what's on the table right now seems to be some combination of tougher background checks, the ban on high capacity magazines you mentioned and so on. i think that charles and i probably agree that both of those are unlikely to make a big difference in terms of gun violence overall. i think the background check legislation is in certain ways more promising than the ban on assault weapons that a lot of liberals are interested in. we had a ban on assault weapons and it had no discernible impact. they might have impact on the shooting. some is accidental violence b
to do absolutely nothing. >> do you city as more of a set up for the elections in 2014 and 2016? >> in part. the white house will try to hit a sweet spot with whatever policy proposals they come up with. they want something that is moderate enough and in certain ways minor enough that it has a chance of passing the senate and the house. also something that seems reasonable enough that in the fairly high likely scenario that is doesn't pass, they can take it to the public in 2014 and 2016 and say here's another example of republicans. what's on the table seems to be a combination of tougher background checks and the ban on high capacity magazines and so on. charles and i probably agree that both are unlikely to make a big difference in terms of gun violence. the background check legislation is in certain ways more promising than the ban on assault weapons and a lot of liberals are interested in. we had a ban on assault weapons that had no impact on the crime rate. background checks and waiting periods may not impact the murder rate, but have an impact on the suicide rate. charles
for the elections in 2014 and 2016? >> i think so in part. i think the president will have something that is sort of moderate enough and in certain ways, you know, minor enough that it has some actual chance of passing the senate and more importantly the house. something that seems reasonable enough that in the fairly high likely scenario that it doesn't pass, they can take it to the public in 2014 and honestly what's on the table right now seems to be some combination of tougher background checks. i think that, i mean, charles and i probably agree that both of those are unlikely to make a difference in terms of gun violence. it's hard to turn off and go back to sleep. intermezzo is the first and only prescription sleep aid approved for use as needed in the middle of the night when you can't get back to sleep. it's an effective sleep medicine you don't take before bedtime. take it in bed only when you need it and have at least four hours left for sleep. do not take intermezzo if you have had an allergic reaction to drugs containing zolpidem, such as ambien. allergic reactions such as shortness of
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)